|
|
Post by Jenna Fischer on Oct 18, 2010 22:29:28 GMT -5
KATHY Selection of Merger Company 5 points for feasibility - is it realistic? Your Score: 5 5 points for originality - is it a unique selection? Your Score: 5 Name of New Company 5 points for creativity - is it a good name? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it unique? Your Score: 4 Creation of New Logo 5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean? Your Score: 4 5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images? Your Score: 3 Written Proposal 5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge? Your Score: 5 5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box? Your Score: 4 5 points for quality - is it well written/professional? Your Score: 4 Overall 0 points if we think it's awful. 5 points if we think it's ok/poor. 10 points if we think it's good. 20 points if we think it's great. 30 points if we think it's the best. Your Score: 15 Overall Score: 57 |
|
|
|
Post by Jenna Fischer on Oct 18, 2010 22:30:42 GMT -5
KIM Selection of Merger Company 5 points for feasibility - is it realistic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it a unique selection? Your Score: 3 Name of New Company 5 points for creativity - is it a good name? Your Score: 2 5 points for originality - is it unique? Your Score: 3 Creation of New Logo 5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean? Your Score: 0 5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic? Your Score: 0 5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images? Your Score: 0 Written Proposal 5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge? Your Score: 2 5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box? Your Score: 2 5 points for quality - is it well written/professional? Your Score: 1 Overall 0 points if we think it's awful. 5 points if we think it's ok/poor. 10 points if we think it's good. 20 points if we think it's great. 30 points if we think it's the best. Your Score: 5 Overall Score: 22 |
|
|
|
Post by Jenna Fischer on Oct 18, 2010 22:32:25 GMT -5
ORLANDO Selection of Merger Company 5 points for feasibility - is it realistic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it a unique selection? Your Score: 4 Name of New Company 5 points for creativity - is it a good name? Your Score: 5 5 points for originality - is it unique? Your Score: 5 Creation of New Logo 5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean? Your Score: 4 5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images? Your Score: 4 Written Proposal 5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge? Your Score: 4 5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box? Your Score: 5 5 points for quality - is it well written/professional? Your Score: 4 Overall 0 points if we think it's awful. 5 points if we think it's ok/poor. 10 points if we think it's good. 20 points if we think it's great. 30 points if we think it's the best. Your Score: 10 Overall Score: 53 |
|
|
|
Post by Jenna Fischer on Oct 18, 2010 22:33:47 GMT -5
SOPHIA Selection of Merger Company 5 points for feasibility - is it realistic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it a unique selection? Your Score: 3 Name of New Company 5 points for creativity - is it a good name? Your Score: 0 5 points for originality - is it unique? Your Score: 0 Creation of New Logo 5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean? Your Score: 5 5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic? Your Score: 5 5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images? Your Score: 3 Written Proposal 5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge? Your Score: 5 5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box? Your Score: 3 5 points for quality - is it well written/professional? Your Score: 4 Overall 0 points if we think it's awful. 5 points if we think it's ok/poor. 10 points if we think it's good. 20 points if we think it's great. 30 points if we think it's the best. Your Score: 10 Overall Score: 42 |
|
|
|
Post by Jenna Fischer on Oct 18, 2010 22:40:29 GMT -5
HALLE Selection of Merger Company 5 points for feasibility - is it realistic? Your Score: 4 5 points for originality - is it a unique selection? Your Score: 3 Name of New Company 5 points for creativity - is it a good name? Your Score: 0 5 points for originality - is it unique? Your Score: 0 Creation of New Logo 5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean? Your Score: 3 5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic? Your Score: 3 5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images? Your Score: 3 Written Proposal 5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge? Your Score: 4 5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box? Your Score: 3 5 points for quality - is it well written/professional? Your Score: 4 Overall 0 points if we think it's awful. 5 points if we think it's ok/poor. 10 points if we think it's good. 20 points if we think it's great. 30 points if we think it's the best. Your Score: 10 Overall Score: 37 |
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 18, 2010 23:51:03 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Sophia
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 5
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 4
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 1
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 0
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 3
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 2
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 3
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 3
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 4
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 5
Total Score: 33
What I liked: I loved how how you were able to sell the points of why Pepsi should merge with Expedia, with emphasis on Pepsi's Global hold and how Expedia would enhance that. I believe this is something that you could really see in mainstream today.
What I didn't like: I felt like you really missed the object or idea of the merger. I tried to be open but felt as though I was looking more at an ideal for a promotion than a merger proposal. The description of Expedia's business was practically repeated almost to seem as filler. Also I was not really impressed with the name, if the name for the new company was, "Pepsi/Expedia challenge".
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 0:17:38 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Orlando
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 5
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 5
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 4
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 4
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 5
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 4
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 4
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 3
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 20
Total Score: 61
What I liked: I thought you had a lot of creativity in this. I was impressed with the art work, and can imagine. The slogan, despite being simple, actually for me really works and fits the product. I'm really hard pressed to find much that I did not like about this product.
What I did not like: Calci-Cola, albeit a unique and fitting name for the product, I feel isn't as appealing to the public, and in particular kids. Unfortunately despite the benefits of such a product I don't see parents flocking to the stores for this product.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 0:39:18 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Kim
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 2
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 3
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 0
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 0
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 0
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 1
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 2
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 0
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 5
Total Score: 20
What I liked: Thought the name was cute, definitely a lot better than Cepsi. 
What I did not like: I understand time constrains prevailed here, but I would have loved to see what kind of logo/image you could have created. Best of luck with midterms
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 1:13:08 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Kathy
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 5
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 4
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 3
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 4
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 3
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 5
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 4
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 4
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 20
Total Score: 60
What I liked: I loved the product. I could easily see myself going to the store and buy a case, or two of this for the weekend. America needs a product like this. Also a great job making a fun and carefree atmosphere in your presentation. I also enjoyed the replacement of the Barrel with the Pepsi can in the logo. Nice merger of the two logos.
What I did not like: I don't know if the name blew me out of the water. It was to the point, but I don't think it creates an identity of it's own. Also a little more originality in the logo would have done a lot more for me as well, rather than just a merge of the two companies logos.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 1:27:23 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Jason
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 3
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 2
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 1
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 2
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 2
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 1
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 5
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 3
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 2
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 5
Total Score: 29
What I liked: I loved the idea. Green is the big thing right now and any company that is going that way is going to sell products. There is a lot of R&D money that would have to be sunk into this, but I feel like it's something that could really happen in today's market.
What I did not like: I understand you didn't have the time to devote to this, but I would have loved to see a little better logo placed together. The name also could have been a lot more creative then just abutting the two company names together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 1:48:07 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Halle
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 2
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 1
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 1
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 3
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 2
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 4
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 3
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 3
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 10
Total Score: 35
What I liked: I think you made a really good argument, with the idea of a monopoly(if approved by the Attorney General) the profits for such a company would be outstanding, and obviously would hold a huge market share in the soda industry. I also think you did a good job on the combined can image.
What I did not like: I wanted to see a new logo for this, and really the existence of the old logos just didn't do anything to wow me. I also think in a rebranding like this, the name would need to be something more unique than an abutting of the previous company names.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 2:14:54 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Eve
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 4
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 3
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 4
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 5
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 3
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 4
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 4
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 4
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 10
Total Score: 47
What I liked: I loved the appeal of the logo and all around banner which I could see being used as promotional poster. I though there were some clever promotional products, in particular the Pepsi Challenge and Body Slammin' Berry. Here is another one, how about Tap-out Tangerine! You did a really extensive job of describing your product and I appreciated that.
What I did not like: I don't know if there is anyway that a family friendly program can be put together and still have the same fan base that they maintain now, which is part of the merger appeal. People will want products like Body Slammin' Berry because it is edgier. The only thing I wasn't excited about with the logo was that it was just the existing logo's combined and I was hoping there would be a completely original logo created.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 2:42:41 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Chuck
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 5
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 3
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 2
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 2
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 1
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 4
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 3
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 5
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 20
Total Score: 52
What I liked: Wow, I think you did a great job putting together a great presentation. I really enjoyed learning a lot about the Calgary Flames, and if I was given a presentation about where to invest my money like this, I would feel very comfortable where my money would go.
What I did not like: I was really disappointed with the logo. I can only think that because this was approached as Pepsi as a sponsor and not as Pepsi merging with the Flames, or acquiring them, it most likely limited what you could do with the logo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Biffle on Oct 19, 2010 2:58:28 GMT -5
Houseguest's Name: Barrack
Scored by: Greg
Selection of Merger Company
5 points for feasibility - is it realistic?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it a unique selection?
Your Score: 4
Name of New Company
5 points for creativity - is it a good name?
Your Score: 4
5 points for originality - is it unique?
Your Score: 4
Creation of New Logo
5 points for quality - is it professional, neat, clean?
Your Score: 4
5 points for creativity - is it attractive, aesthetic?
Your Score: 3
5 points for originality - is it more than just copy/pasted images?
Your Score: 4
Written Proposal
5 points for argument - is it a legit argument to merge?
Your Score: 3
5 points for innovation - did they think outside the box?
Your Score: 5
5 points for quality - is it well written/professional?
Your Score: 3
Overall
0 points if we think it's awful.
5 points if we think it's ok/poor.
10 points if we think it's good.
20 points if we think it's great.
30 points if we think it's the best.
Your Score: 30
Total Score: 68
What I liked: I think the overall presentation was excellent. I enjoyed all the images and thought everything was very well thought out from how money can be earned to how the company would grow under the new merger. I definitely viewer this as my best choice for merger.
What I did not like: I was a little reserved on Mister P. As a company trying to sell a product, we don't like to associate our product with obesity, and Mister P. gives a vibe that you drink our product, you'll look like this. Granted he is humorous, but as a larger person myself, a mascot like this could be sensitive.
|
|
